| Title |
First record of functional underground traps in a pitcher plant: Nepenthes pudica (Nepenthaceae), a new species from North Kalimantan, Borneo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PhytoKeys, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3897/phytokeys.201.82872 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Dančák, Ľuboš Majeský, Václav Čermák, Michal R. Golos, Bartosz J. Płachno, Wewin Tjiasmanto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,471 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 172 | 12% |
| United States | 120 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 60 | 4% |
| France | 23 | 2% |
| Canada | 19 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 12 | <1% |
| Australia | 11 | <1% |
| Spain | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| Other | 108 | 7% |
| Unknown | 924 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1320 | 90% |
| Scientists | 129 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#9,862
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from PhytoKeys
#1
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367
of 446,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PhytoKeys
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.